Ports of Power: China’s Expanding Grip on Africa’s Trade Gateways

CRITICAL CONTEXT: THE WEST’S SHIFTING APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT
Over the past century, the U.S. has been the dominant player in foreign assistance, but its approach has shifted from infrastructure-driven development to more conditional aid focused on governance, health, and capacity-building. 

• Post-WWII to Early Independence (1945–1965): In the immediate post-war period, U.S. foreign aid primarily targeted European reconstruction and infrastructure, as well as aid to East Asia with little focus on Africa. 

• Global Institutions & Conditions: Established in 1944, the World Bank (IBRD) anchored U.S.-led reconstruction efforts, promoting infrastructure investment tied to Western ideals, including democratic governance and, eventually, human rights.

• The Cold War: As African nations gained independence, U.S. aid to Africa rose from negligible levels in the early 1950s to $228 million annually by 1962, aiming to counter Soviet influence.

• A Changing Tide (1970–Present): U.S. domestic infrastructure spending declined from approximately 4-5% of GDP in the 1970s to around 2.3% in recent years, shifting focus from new construction to maintenance and potentially impacting national infrastructure expertise.

• Modern Funding Shift: The World Bank now prioritizes capacity-building projects like education and agriculture over large-scale infrastructure. Since the 2010s, 70% of U.S. aid to Africa has gone to health, with little support for export-enabling infrastructure.

Africa remains the least developed continent with the greatest infrastructure needs, yet U.S.-led funding has shifted away from infrastructure and often comes with conditions many African nations cannot meet. For example, there are 22 dictatorships in Africa, according to the World Population Review.

CRITICAL CONTEXT: CHINA’S PROMISE – THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched in 2013, has invested over $1 trillion in global infrastructure, funding projects in every African nation except Eswatini, which maintains diplomatic ties with Taiwan.

• Infrastructure Focus: The BRI prioritizes energy, roads, railways, and seaports, driving large-scale infrastructure development.

• Economic Reality: China’s status as the world’s largest exporter provides ample foreign reserves for large-scale investments, while its rapid economic rise has built deep expertise in infrastructure-related engineering.

• Comprehensive Approach: China serves as lender, builder, owner, and operator for many projects lending both capital and its expertise. This model appeals to nations seeking turnkey infrastructure solutions.

• Non-interference Policy: China’s BRI follows a non-interference policy, outwardly emphasizing sovereignty and mutual respect. Unlike Western aid, BRI financing lacks political conditions on democracy, governance, or human rights—framing such requirements as neocolonialism, according to Xi Jinping.

China’s BRI fills the gap left by declining, conditional Western aid while leveraging its infrastructure expertise and vast foreign reserves.

DYNAMICS OF CHINA’S AFRICAN SEAPORT NETWORK

Through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China has built the world’s largest port network, maintaining a presence in at least 61 African ports, with 55 of them constructed by China as of 2023. By mapping major port projects across Africa in our comprehensive map (see here), one thing becomes clear: China is deeply embedded in the continent’s port infrastructure.

The Power of Ports in Africa

Ports are uniquely critical to African trade due to limited road and rail alternatives. Unlike other regions with extensive inland transport networks, Africa’s economies rely heavily on maritime trade, making port efficiency a key determinant of economic performance.

• High Dependency on Seaborne Trade: Approximately 90% of African goods are transported by sea, compared to 80% globally (UNCTAD).

• Limited Inland Transport Alternatives: Road and rail infrastructure remains underdeveloped, making ports the primary gateway for both imports and exports.

• The African Market: Africa accounts for 7% of global maritime exports and 5% of imports by volume, highlighting its growing role in global supply chains. Key export-heavy ports include Lagos (Nigeria), Durban (South Africa), Mombasa (Kenya), and Djibouti, handling millions of tons of cargo annually.

The Chinese Economic Advantage

China gains numerous economic benefits by investing in and often operating ports across the African continent, including:

Access to Critical Minerals

• Many African nations are rich in critical minerals essential for China's industrial base, including cobalt (DRC), lithium (Zimbabwe), bauxite (Guinea), and rare earth elements (Tanzania & South Africa).

• China dominates global mineral refining, processing 59% of the world’s lithium, 73% of cobalt, and 90% of rare earth elements, making African resource access crucial.

• Long-term supply agreements and infrastructure-for-resources deals ensure uninterrupted flows of raw materials for China’s manufacturing sector.

Chokepoint Security and Trade Resilience

• China has invested heavily along Africa’s coastline, focusing on ports from the Gulf of Aden through the Suez Canal to the Mediterranean, a critical artery for global trade.

• Strategic ports, including Djibouti, Mombasa (Kenya), and Port Said (Egypt), help China reduce supply chain risks by ensuring alternative shipping routes.

Offshoring and Industrial Expansion

• Many African ports developed by China include integrated industrial parks and, in some cases, entire urban developments, such as the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Nigeria.

• Offshoring manufacturing to Africa allows China to mitigate rising labor costs at home while benefiting from Africa’s cheaper workforce and growing consumer markets.

China’s economic engagement with African ports is not just about trade—it’s a long-term strategy to secure resources, control supply chains, and expand industrial influence beyond its borders.

Geopolitical Control

China’s growing presence in African port infrastructure extends beyond economic interests, influencing geopolitics through debt financing, diplomatic leverage, and potential military expansion.

Debt-Driven Influence

• China now controls 15.3% of all African external debt (as of 2023), making several nations highly vulnerable to debt distress and strategic deal-making.

• The case of Hambantota Port in Sri Lanka is often cited as a cautionary example of China's so-called debt-trap diplomacy. Unable to meet its sovereign debt obligations, Sri Lanka leased the port to a Chinese company for 99 years in an effort to ease its financial burden.

• Similar concerns exist in Africa, where China has financed major port projects in countries with high debt burdens, raising fears of potential asset seizures or lease agreements favoring Beijing.

Soft Power Influence

• African nations’ continued reliance on Chinese funding and infrastructure investment incentivizes political alignment with China on the global stage.

• UN Vote on China's Human Rights Record: In October 2022, the UN Human Rights Council voted on a resolution to debate alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang. The motion failed, with 19 countries voting against, 17 in favor, and 11 abstaining.

  • The majority of African nations either voted against or abstained, with Somalia being the only African country to support holding a debate on China’s alleged violations.

  • This pattern reflects China's diplomatic leverage in Africa, where economic dependence translates into political alignment.

Potential Military Expansion

• While all Chinese-operated ports in Africa (except for their naval base Djibouti) are commercial, they have dual-use potential, meaning they could serve as logistical hubs for Chinese naval operations.

• The Djibouti naval base, China’s first overseas military installation established in 2017, highlights Beijing’s intent to secure a strategic presence near critical chokepoints—Djibouti is located by the Bab el Mandeb Strait.

• Reports suggest China is actively exploring options to build a naval base on the Atlantic coast of Africa, a move that has sparked strong opposition from the U.S. due to concerns about Chinese military influence near key Western trade routes.

China’s African port strategy is not just about trade—it is a multifaceted tool for economic control, diplomatic leverage, and potential military expansion, reshaping the balance of power on the continent.

Espionage Concerns in Chinese Smart Port Infrastructure

Concerns are growing that Chinese-built smart ports could facilitate intelligence gathering. While Beijing denies these allegations, past incidents raise security questions.

• Chinese-Made Cranes as Surveillance Tools: In 2023, the U.S. Department of Defense flagged Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries (ZPMC) cranes, widely used in global ports, as potential espionage platforms. These cranes are equipped with advanced sensors capable of tracking shipments, including military cargo.

• The African Union Headquarters Breach (2012–2017): In 2018, reports revealed that the African Union (AU) headquarters in Addis Ababa had been secretly transmitting sensitive data to servers in Shanghai for five years. Built and fully funded by China as a 'gift' in 2012, the building’s IT infrastructure contained backdoors that routed the nightly data transfers. AU technicians first noticed anomalies in early 2017 when they detected unexplained spikes in data traffic during late-night hours when the building was unoccupied. Further investigation uncovered that the data transfers had been occurring nightly since the building's completion, routed through backdoors embedded in the facility’s IT infrastructure.

Despite China’s denials, these incidents underscore broader concerns over cybersecurity risks in Chinese-built critical infrastructure.

As Africa edges toward becoming the world’s most populous continent, the need for infrastructure development has never been more urgent. While Western nations have been slow to invest, China has seized the opportunity, rapidly building key infrastructure across the continent. With a firm grip on the ports and logistics that connect Africa’s people and resources to the global economy, China’s influence is undeniable. The question now is how this growing dominance will shape Africa’s future—and what it means for the rest of the world.

Subscribe now to ensure you don’t miss future analyses!